本文系统地梳理了我国目前国家层面现有各种与科技评价相关的管理办法，针对不同的评价类型，包括项目评价、人才评价、机构评价等，采用内容分析方法，分别从评价目的、评价内容、评价方法、评价时期以及评价结果应用等维度出发，分析了现有各种评价管理办法的特征。在此基础上，重点对各个评价管理办法中的评议方法与方式进行了分析，并将其与美国科学基金会（NSF）和国立卫生研究院（NIH）的相关评价方法进行了对比，提出了我国目前定量评价与评价执行等方面存在的问题与建议。

China’s existing administrative rules for S&T evaluation are summarized systematically. By using the content analysis method, the characteristics of all the existing evaluation administrative rules for administrating different types of S&T evaluation such as program evaluation,talent evaluation, institute evaluation, are analyzed from the angles of evaluation purpose, evaluation content, evaluation method, evaluation period and results application. On the basis of this,the evaluation methods for every administrative rule are discussed emphatically and compared with that of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institute of Health (NIH) of America, and the problems of China’s present quantitative evaluation and evaluation implementation are pointed out, and relevant suggestions for improvement are put forward.

中国科学院知识创新工程研究所评价专项（Y200011601）